Inside RIDE
Public Schools
Learning
Teachers & Administrators
Students, Families & Community
Print This Page The Highly Qualified Leaders Project  
Exploratory Program for Teacher Leaders

A program designed to attract and provide talented teachers with valuable exploratory administrative experiences with veteran principals in order to encourage these teachers to enroll in preparation programs and to ultimately become principals.

Links to Content:
Demonstration Site
Target Population
Need and Intent
Synopsis
Implementation Process
Tips for Implementation
Case Study
Program Components and Materials
Contact for More Information


Demonstration Site: Southern Rhode Island Regional Collaborative (SORICO)

SORICO, created in 1988 by the RI Legislature, is a regional service agency working with 9 school districts in southern Rhode Island. This includes 8 high schools, 11 middle schools and 33 elementary schools. There are about 23,000 students, of which 25% receive special education services. The nine districts include Block Island, Chariho, East Greenwich, Exeter/West Greenwich, Jamestown, Narragansett, North Kingstown, South Kingstown and Westerly. The stated mission of SORICO is “to develop and offer programs and services that meet the needs of its member districts when such services and programs can more effectively and economically be provided on a collaborative basis.”


Target Population: The project involved teacher leaders from eight of the school districts in SORICO and principal mentors.

Need and Intent: To develop an aspiring principal program aimed at attracting interested and highly successful teacher leaders to encourage them to enroll in principal preparation/certification programs and to make a commitment to becoming a principal within five years. The project design created a triangulation through which the teacher leader could be exposed to various leadership styles by being assigned two principal mentors outside of their school. This experience allowed the aspiring principals to evaluate their own strengths and limitations as future school leaders.

“In over 40 years as an educator, I found that the shortcoming in training principals is in instructional leadership and not in how to properly manage schools. Traditional principal preparation programs do a fairly good job in preparing teachers to become managers with a base of knowledge about school law, human resources, finance, labor relations, school community relations, and other discrete areas. This instruction is more concrete in nature than the development of a personal vision and myriad of skills and knowledge that principals must have as instructional leaders if they are to move their schools and all their students to new levels of academic achievement. It makes sense to find bright teachers who, as future principals, can help teachers, even good teachers, become more successful teachers. We have entered a new era in principal leadership – no longer is school success measured solely by how smoothly a school runs – it is now scrutinized very closely by what students are learning and how well are they learning what they need to know to be successful in the future. A principal now has to delegate more of the operational aspects of his/her role to assistants and to leadership teams. They cannot be the sole instructional leader in their school, they must know how to collaborate and share this leadership with, you guessed it, teacher leaders. For these reasons, selecting teacher leaders for a project such as ours make a lot of sense because these people have already taken the first step toward the principalship.”
- William R. Holland, Ed.D, Project Director

Synopsis: Teacher leaders were matched with two principal mentors who they observed, interacted with, and shadowed during and after the school day. (The project provided release time and covered the cost of substitutes for the teacher leaders.) As with SORICO’s Pre-Internships for Aspiring Principals, the teacher leaders were not matched with their own principals but two other principals from different school districts. It was explained to the teacher leaders that the project design would follow a comparative model by having them observe and interact with two different principal mentors. They could then compare the leadership styles, strategies, and achievements of these individuals with their current principal or other principals they may have worked with in the past.

The selection of principal mentors was not restricted to SORICO districts since the aim was to have the very best principal mentors that could be found throughout the state. Principal mentors were required to have had mentor training (in this case they were trained through the Education Partnership’s Mentor Training Institute and past success as a mentor. Teacher leaders made formal agreements to become principals within the next five years and there is an explicit expectation that they will serve in one of the sponsoring districts.


Implementation Process:

1. July-September, 2005

  • Selection of teacher leaders through nomination by SORICO principals and superintendents.

2. October, 2005

  • Final screening and selection of candidates.
  • Determination of how many principal mentors are needed and at what grade levels

3. November 2005

  • Selection of principal-mentors by Project Director.

4. December 2005

  • Workshop with teacher leaders and principal mentors.
    • Assignments of teacher leaders with two principal mentors each.
    • Explanation of journals to be developed by teacher mentors.
    • Scheduling of first visitation.

5. January – April 2006

  • Shadowing visits, individual follow-up meetings, attendance/observation by teacher leaders of principal mentors in leadership situations. Samples of leadership situations include: Observing a principal conducting a faculty or School Improvement Team meeting; attending a parent meeting where school achievement results are reviewed; attending a leadership meeting conducted by the principal; sitting in on a teacher observation and/or evaluation conference; etc.
  • Principal mentors provide Project Director via telephone and/or e-mail with a summary of contacts with teacher leaders on an ongoing basis.

6. End of April 2006 – Final Workshop

  • State department of education and college/agency representatives met with teacher leaders to discuss the steps to principal certification.
  • Teacher leaders also submitted their final journals and shared perceptions of their experience with the Project Director and their colleagues. They were asked to include their responses to the following questions in their journal:
    • What are 3 or 4 things you learned in this project that you thought were of particular value?
    • Has your attitude and interest about becoming a principal now changed after participating in this project? If yes, how? If no, why not?
    • Did this experience change our own perceptions about the type of principal you may be or want to be in the future?
    • How could the project have been improved?
  • Click here to see the template for the teacher leader journal.


Tips for Implementation:

  • It is important to remember that through this experience, some participants will realize that they will be more fulfilled by remaining classroom teachers and teacher leaders.
  • Using two or more districts provides a higher level of principal mentor quality and diversity.
  • It is recommended to increase the number of days observing a principal mentor to a minimum of two days for each mentor, ideally, three days. This would insure better follow-up and continuing contact and interaction. Of course, funding would be necessary to cover these additional substitute days.


Case Study: Mike is a first grade teacher at an elementary school in South Kingstown. A veteran teacher with an outstanding reputation, he is valued by parents, fellow teachers, and administrators. He has thought about eventually becoming an elementary principal but has not yet acted on it. He thought the teacher leader project might provide him with some answers and elevate his personal motivation.

During the project, he was assigned to two elementary principal mentors in Coventry and in Chariho. Both principals have outstanding reputations and their high performing schools have received commendations locally and from the state.

Mike sent the Project Director an e-mail after his first shadow day: “I visited my first elementary school today, spending the day with the principal. I was able to sit down with her and discuss her role and responsibilities at great length. What a wonderful climate she has established at the school! I was able to tour the classrooms, as well as observe her in varied settings. I really enjoyed my experience today, and I will be sure to describe it at greater length in my journal reflection.”

(NOTE: By the end of the project, 11 of the 15 teacher leaders in the program had enrolled in certification course work or had made applications to do so with the intention of becoming principals as soon as possible. Of the remaining few, the majority realized through the project that the commitment either of certification and/or the principalship itself was not currently feasible and/or professionally appropriate for them.)


Program Components and Materials:
Template for Teacher Leader Journal


Contact for More Information:
Name: Lizann Gibson
Job Title: Executive Director, SORICO
Role in Project: LEA contact
Phone: (401) 295-2888 x110
E-mail: sorico@ride.ri.net
Address: 646 Camp Avenue, North Kingstown, RI 02852

Disclaimer | Site Map | Print Page | Comments / Corrections
2006 Rhode Island Department of Elementary and Secondary Education. All rights reserved.
Please contact webmaster@ride.ri.gov with questions or comments about this Web site.
Rhode Island Department of Education 255 Westminster Street Providence, RI 02903 401.222.4600

Site Best Viewed at 1024x768

 
Download Adobe Reader